Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to averygrimes.com

Avery Grimes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
aleksvgrig.com
Home - Aleksei Grigorev
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
corywg.com
Cory G.
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
purplelabs.co.uk 🇬🇧
Rob Holmes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
adamgriffin.io
Adam Griffin
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
honoretech.dev
HonoreTech - Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
louiseyousre.com
Louise Yousre
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ehabhosam.app
Ehab Hosam
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
jweaver.dev
Jason Weaver
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andrewpedersen.net
Andrew Pedersen | Creative engineering and community leader
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andrewpedersen.dev
Andrew Pedersen | Creative engineering and community leader
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
mrhamer.com
Professional Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
4da.ai
4DA -- Reads the internet for developers. Privately, locally, sharper every day.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
coveryourasp.com
CoverYourASP - by James Shaw
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
juanitocomponent.com
Juanito Component - Professional Developer & Component Creator
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
paivarodrigo.com
Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
0xme.dev
Muhammad Empire — Full‑Stack Platforms
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
burakcanga.com
Burak Çanga - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
acsalazar.com
Andres Portfolio | Home
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.