Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to averybourne.org

Andy Manar – for State Senate · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
paulroseforsenate.com
Paul Rose for State Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
74match
kh4mi.com
Korey Hall For State Senate
2 shared topicselections
73match
simonforflorida.com
Corey Simon for State Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
73match
simonforfl.com
Corey Simon for State Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
73match
pearlforsenate.com
Howard Pearl for State Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
73match
angelabrennan.com
Angela Brennan for State Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
72match
andrewgounardes.com
Andrew Gounardes for State Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
72match
deniseforgeorgia.com
Denise Pierce Burns for State Senate
2 shared topicselections
71match
aberforassembly.com
Aber Kawas for State Senate | District 12
2 shared topicselections
71match
mamabearmcneal.com
Karen McNeal for SD State Senate 32
2 shared topicspolitics
71match
alfheimforwisconsin.org
Kris Alfheim for State Senate | Wisconsin
2 shared topicselections
70match
andrewmathews.com
Andrew Mathews for State Senate – Senate District 27
2 shared topicselections
70match
manaformaine.com
Mana Abdi for Maine State Senate – District 21
2 shared topicselections
70match
andybarrforcongress.com
Andy Barr for Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
70match
andybarrforky.com
Andy Barr for Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
70match
peaceforidaho.com
Mandy Peace for Idaho State Senate - District 28
2 shared topicselections
69match
natemorris.com
Nate Morris for Senate
2 shared topicselections
68match
bettiecookscott.com
Bettie Cook Scott | for District 1 State Senate
2 shared topicselections

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.