Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to averagejim.me

Jim's Portfolio – Digital Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
lauraader.com
Laura's UX & Product Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
80match
robabsyeda.com
Product Designer | Robab Syeda
2 shared topicsdesign
78match
andreacontreras.me
Andrea Contreras | Product Designer - Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
78match
matteolever.com
Matteo Lever - Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
aaronct.me
Aaron C-T — Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
lamine-drame.com
Lamine drame – Freelance Digital Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
masnabinumeed.com
Masna bin Umeed — Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
arrumman.info
Rumman - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
matt-walsh.com
Matt Walsh – Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
kylehao.com
Kyle Hao — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
alex-andrea.io
Alex Andrea | Digital Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
adamborthwick.com
Adam Borthwick - Digital Product Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
arjunawoodrow.com
Arjuna Woodrow – Brighton-based Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
ahmedportfoliodesign.com
Ahmed Musah | UX & Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
faustoperez.com
Fausto Pérez – Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
kwongli.com
Kwong Li – UX/UI & Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
krmaazha.com
KRMAAZHA | UX/UI & Product Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
kritikadesign.com
Kritika Singh | Product Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.