Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to avenmathias.com

Aven Mathias - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
isnayousuf.com
Isna Yousuf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
itshamzajaved.com
Hamza Javed | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
morhys.com
Morhys - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ethanowens.dev
Ethan Owens - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
richardo.dev
Richard O | Full-Stack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
syifasrh.com
Syifa Sarah - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mohanedmetawea.com
Mohaned Metawea | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
rileycrahen.com
Riley Crahen - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
sylee.dev
Sy Lee - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
hesannaveed.com
Hesan Naveed | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
jacklillie.dev
Jack Lillie | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
swanksoftware.com
Dakota Swank | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
isosman.com
Islam Osman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
itstanmaymitra.com
Tanmay Mitra — Full-Stack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
rida-khan.com
Rida Zahid Khan - Backend Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
dmasilva.com
David Owuor | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
donsmartx.com
Don Smartx — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.