Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to avajohnson.dev

Ava Johnson | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
samuelrath.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
lwebb.dev
Logan Webb | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ogiogidayo.com
Eiji Ogiwara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
shahidhasan.com
Md. Shahid Hasan | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
mdsarmad.com
Md Sarmad | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
saqlain.dev
Muhammad Saqlain | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sameedrazi.com
Sameed Razi — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sonangga.dev
Angga Maulana | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ayushgurung.com
Ayush Gurung - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
icarusuk.dev
Marcus Graham | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sameerali.dev
Sameer Ali | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alexandergarin.com
Alexander Garin | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
rysuri.com
Ry Suriyathep | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alamsierra.com
Alam Sierra | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alex-zapata.com
Alex Zapata | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kennethaidoo.com
Kenneth Aidoo | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
byyoussefmaged.com
Youssef Maged | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
iamjaydenliew.com
Jayden Liew | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.