Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to authorsanlashun.com

Author San Lashun · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
jnedecky.com
Joel Nedecky – Crime Fiction Author
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
joelnedecky.com
Joel Nedecky – Crime Fiction Author
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
doyleweldonknight.com
Doyle Weldon Knight
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
carriewalkerwrites.com
Christian Fiction Author | Carrie Walker Writes
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
susankingbooks.com
Author Susan King
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
devonstationbooks.com
Women's fiction, with heart. – Women's fiction author
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
salhunter.com
Sal Hunter, Author | Sal Hunter, Author
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
denisjlacomb.com
Author Denis J. LaComb
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
diannegallagher.net
Dianne Gallagher - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
nancytague.com
Nancy Tague, author - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
susansands.com
Susan Sands – Author of Women's Southern Fiction
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
sallyhanan.com
Home - Author Sally Hanan
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
caroseauthor.com
C.A. Rose – Author of historical fiction
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
lyfaulk.com
Ly Faulk – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
devneyperry.com
Author Devney Perry
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
susanslaterauthor.com
SUSAN SLATER, AUTHOR - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
awmasonauthor.com
A.W. Mason Author – Dark Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
swordwater.com
Daniel J. Rothery – Author Site
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.