Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to authormjraven.com

Home - Romance Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
courtbehr.com
Court Behr - Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
75match
lorynfox.com
Welcome - Loryn Fox | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
74match
bwwmromance.com
Home - BWWM Romance
1 shared topicsromance
73match
abrapressler.com
Abra Pressler | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
jromancole.com
J. Roman Cole | MM Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
ecorva.com
Home - Elin Corva - Indie Rockstar Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
rebeccaraine.com
Rebecca Raine – Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
ebmorrison.com
E.B. Morrison | MM Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
alexandrataylor.org
Alexandra Taylor – romance author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
cpharrisauthor.com
Home | C.P. Harris Author | MM Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
siennacarr.com
Sienna Carr – Sweet Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
tggoreromancebooks.com
TG Gore | Surgeon Turned Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
tessasloan.com
Tessa Sloan Contemporary Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
71match
lovestruckromance.com
Home - Lovestruck Romance
1 shared topicsromance
71match
abigailagar.com
Regency Romance Author Abigail Agar - Homepage
1 shared topicsromance
70match
lornarosewellauthor.com
Lorna Rosewell, Contemporary Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
lovestorynovel.com
Best Romance Novels
1 shared topicsromance
70match
angelajohnsonauthor.org
Angela E. Johnson - Sweet Regency Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.