Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to authormiathompson.com

Author Mia Thompson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
alejandrovarela.net
Alejandro Varela - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
asterquinn.com
Author Aster Quinn
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
addisonhalebooks.com
Addison Hale Books – Official website of Author Addison Hale.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
mrarmitage.com
M. R. Armitage - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
bryanoneill.com
Bryan O'Neill | Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
tessalbert.com
Author Tess Albert
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
cpdemaris.com
Author | novelist
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
adinakingauthor.com
Adina King | Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
brwidney.com
B.R. Widney | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
bysonjathomas.com
Sonja Thomas, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
bugandbearbooks.com
Bug & Bear Books – Website of author Paul Roberts
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
judiflanagan.com
Judi Flanagan, author of Don't Play With Fyre
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
juliannorth.com
Juliannorth.com – Website of author Julian North
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
ga-wooldridge.com
GA Wooldridge | Author Gate
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
louisemarburg.com
Louise Marburg – author website
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
julia-butler.com
Author Julia Butler | Home
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
butidontwanna.net
Mildred Pope, author of "But I Don't Wanna Take A Bath!": A Mike and Tyke Series
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
bymariellethompson.com
Marielle Thompson – Gothic fiction author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.