Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to authormatthewlevy.com

Author Matthew Levy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
annebabb.com
Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
lyraleon.com
Author Lyra Leon
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
m-gillman.com
Matthew Elliott Gillman
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
2-years.com
TWO YEARS | by author Max Tower
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
susan-neil.com
Author Susan Neil
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
andysolomonwriter.com
Author | Andy Solomon
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
caitlinmyer.com
Author | Caitlin Myer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
ethancorven.com
Author | Ethan Corven
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
eugeniarich.com
Author | Eugenia Rich
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
magickalmama.com
Jenna Case - Author |
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
richardlongauthor.com
Author | Richard Long
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
caitlinupshall.com
Home | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
andreadomanski.com
Author Andrea Domanski
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
annemacreynold.com
Author Anne MacReynold
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
cameronbauder.com
Author | Cameron Bauder
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
ethanmichaeli.com
Author | Ethan Michaeli
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
richardchaleauthor.com
Author Richard C Hale |
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
shaunhamilton.com
Books - Author - Artist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.