Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to authorjond.com

Author Jonathan David – Author of Fiction · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
annewinchell.com
Anne Winchell – Author of Hopeful Speculative Fiction
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
lorettapolaski.com
Loretta Polaski – Author of Suspense
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
ehbernard.com
Elizabeth H. Bernard - Author of Award-Winning Historical Fiction
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
siennacash.com
Sienna Cash – Author of Worst-Kept Secret
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
astridfick.com
ASTRID FICK – Australian Literary Fiction Author
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
lorimjones.com
Lori M. Jones ~ Author of women's & children's fiction
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
juliaboon.com
Julia Boon – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
adammannan.com
Adam Mannan – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
hopeforthebestbook.com
Vanessa Lafleur – Author site
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
ashlenbrown.com
Ashlen Brown – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
corytoscano.com
Cory Toscano – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
jrludwig.com
J. R. Ludwig – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
adamgochenour.com
Adam Gochenour – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
juliebrooksauthor.com
JULIE BROOKS – Author of A Haunting at Venus Bay
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
gabrielagonzales.com
Gabriela Gonzales – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
pamelamosesbooks.com
Pamela Moses – Author Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
louisemarburg.com
Louise Marburg – author website
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
louisasimpson.com
Louisa Simpson – Author of The Book of Sarah Trilogy
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.