Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to authorandijames.com

Andi James – MM romance author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
jromancole.com
J. Roman Cole | MM Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
abrapressler.com
Abra Pressler | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
73match
ebmorrison.com
E.B. Morrison | MM Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
alexandrataylor.org
Alexandra Taylor – romance author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
courtbehr.com
Court Behr - Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
72match
rebeccaraine.com
Rebecca Raine – Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
71match
juliaconnors.com
Julia Connors | Sports Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
71match
siennacarr.com
Sienna Carr – Sweet Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
71match
lorynfox.com
Welcome - Loryn Fox | Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
71match
tessasloan.com
Tessa Sloan Contemporary Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
tggoreromancebooks.com
TG Gore | Surgeon Turned Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
junelarkbooks.com
June Lark | Spicy Western Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
julesraven.com
Jules Raven — MM Romance Author | Between Fists and Spotlights
1 shared topicsromance
70match
rebeccagallobooks.com
Gallo Books – Romance authors Rebecca and Bea Gallo
1 shared topicsromance
70match
julesackwood.com
Home | Jules Ackwood | Contemporary romance author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
rebeccalorens.com
Rebecca Lorens – Romance Author based in New Zealand
1 shared topicsromance
70match
julianawight.com
Juliana Wight - Historical Scottish Romance Author
1 shared topicsromance
70match
julieortolon.com
Contemporary Romance Author, Julie Ortolon
1 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.