Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to authenticpt.com

Authentic Physical Therapy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
pahlpt.com
Pahl Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
80match
astraptr.com
Astra Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
80match
c3physicaltherapy.com
C3 Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
80match
360physicaltherapy.com
360 Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
79match
1prevailpt.com
Prevail Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
78match
rebalancefairhaven.com
Rebalance Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
78match
rehabwithshaina.com
Shaina Ranjan - Physical Therapist
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
78match
bvphysicaltherapy.com
Restorative Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
78match
refresh-pt.com
ReFresh Physical Therapy - Home
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
78match
astepuppt.com
A Step Up Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
78match
atthecorept.com
HOME | AT THE CORE PHYSICAL THERAPY
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
78match
acltherapy.com
ACL Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
77match
actionpointpt.com
Action Point Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
77match
burgphysicaltherapy.com
Burg Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
77match
moveptmi.com
MOVE Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
77match
movementsolutions-sc.com
Physical Therapy Greenville SC
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
77match
adamsphysicaltherapy.com
Adams Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy
77match
atlasptne.com
Atlas Physical Therapy
1 shared topicsphysical-therapy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.