Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to austinsdev.com

Austin's Dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
lukeleppan.com
Luke Leppan
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
silascandiolli.com
I'm Silas Candiolli… – Java, Software Development, tools and career
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
hojjatk.com
This Developer's Planet
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
lukehays.com
Luke Hays
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andrunevchyn.com
Andrunevchyn - development routine
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
cosycoding.com
Cosycoding | I write about my journey as software developer.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
justinabruinsma.com
Justin Bruinsma
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
justinbruinsma.com
Justin Bruinsma
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewmarkle.com
Andrew Markle · Andrew Markle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
cosullivan.dev
Code Blocks | A personal blog where I break down the world of software development, one block at a time.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
cadenhalstrom.com
Caden's Code HQ
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
justincady.com
Justin Cady
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
justinthedev.com
Justin The Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
juliano-alves.com
Juliano Alves
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
justinklee.com
Justin K Lee
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
sioncodes.com
SionCodes.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
pembrokesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pembroke Software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
buczel.com
Kamil Buczel - iOS Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.