Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to auspexrecords.com

Auspex Records · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
jupiterwax.com
Jupiter Wax Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
73match
sionarecords.com
Siona Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
72match
absorb-records.com
absorb records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
72match
funhouserecords.com
Fun House Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
72match
audiemus.com
Audiemus Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
71match
galapagosrecords.com
Galapagos Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
71match
eintakt.com
Eintakt Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
71match
pacemakerrecords.com
Pacemaker Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
71match
audioonerecords.com
Audio One Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
71match
activitiesrecords.com
Activities Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
70match
cr2records.com
Cr2 Records - Home
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
70match
fufurecords.com
Music | FuFu Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
70match
reinstaterecords.com
Reinstate Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
70match
audioalt-ar.com
Audio Altar Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
70match
accessoryrecords.com
Accessory Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
70match
audiobiterecords.com
AudioBite Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
70match
homiciderecords.com
Homicide Records 2020
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music
70match
pain-productions.com
Duck Nutz Records
1 shared topicsdance-and-electronic-music

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.