similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to aurades.tech

Aurades alternatives & similar sites

AURADES — Engineering Digital Twins for Aerospace Systems — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
neotechlab.ai ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	NeoTechLab.AI — Platform Engineering & Innovation Lab for Digital Media	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
astechnix.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	AStechnix - Engineering Scalable Digital Ecosystems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neplusultra.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Christopher Dwyer — engineering blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sivensystems.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Siven Systems — Excellence in Digital Craftsmanship	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3d-geospatial.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	3D Geospatial: Digital Twin Pipelines, LOD, CI/CD	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astameva.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Astameva — Engineer · Builder · Systems Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intotosystems.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Intoto systems - Systems engineering with a point of view	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csse-journal.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	International Journal of Computer Systems Science and Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
litsolutions-llc.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Lit Solutions LLC — Full-Stack Engineering Studio	United States~ en	technology-and-computing WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
litsolutions.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Lit Solutions LLC — Full-Stack Engineering Studio	United States~ en	technology-and-computing WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dop-amine.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Amine — Engineer · Producer · Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gaulatti.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Javier Godoy — Staff Software Engineer \| Media Infrastructure & Real-Time Systems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sixdevs.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	SixDevs \| Architectural Rigor. Engineering Precision.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myronjanssen.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Platform engineer building calm systems and paved-road automation.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
austenbartels.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Millibyte Studios — Austen Bartels · Embedded Systems Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hudsonreynolds.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hudson Reynolds — Computer Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
slack-engineering.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Engineering at Slack	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garethcooke.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Gareth Cooke — Engineer & Maker	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.