similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to aurabase.com

Home | ENISA · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

accelerate2compliance.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home | BSides DFW

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

bubbleinteract.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

synectics-security.co.uk 🇬🇧

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

HOME | BRUTAL SECURITY

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home | Multishred

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home | My Website

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home | c14g.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

accorppartnerscpallc.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

bsquaredintel.com

Home | Bsquared Intel

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

juanclozano.com

Home | Juan C. Lozano

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

bsidescolumbus.com

Home | BSides Columbus

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home | Cyber Security Company

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.