Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to auggie.dev

Stephen Augustus · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
andrewstaker.com
Stephen "Andrew" Staker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
smssoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Stephen Stewart
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
jshwi.com
Stephen Whitlock
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
jshwisolutions.com
Stephen Whitlock
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
ashish.me
Ashish Patel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
jread.dev
Jamie Read | Engineering Lead
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
brubkr.com
Joel Brubaker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ashleylavery.com
Ashley Lavery - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adityamohta.dev
Kumar Aditya Mohta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adrianmiles.io
Adrian Miles - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
atakans.com
Atakan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
atomaoim.com
Atom
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
burckman.com
Juan Fernando Sarmiento Burckhardt (Juan Burckhardt) – Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
muhammetmacit.com
Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
sikaizhao.com
Sikai's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.