Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to audreybowers.com

Audrey Bowers – writer/poet & editor · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
rebeccauhlman.com
Rebecca Uhlman – Poet & Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
74match
mtraviesowilliams.com
mtw – Poet & Educator
2 shared topicspoetry
73match
reecegritzmacher.com
Reece Rowan Gritzmacher – poet & prose writer
2 shared topicspoetry
72match
caitlindwyer.com
Caitlin Dwyer – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
juliemacleanwriter.com
Julie Maclean – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
lucasjjacob.com
Lucas J Jacob – Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
holligibbs.com
Holli Gibbs – Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
acemckenzie.com
ace mckenzie – writer. warrior. poet. lover.
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
bsarahparis.com
Sarah Paris – writer, poet, pilgrim, bridge-builder
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
silenciobarnes.com
Silencio Barnes - Writer - Poet - Lyricist
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
julianeokotbitek.com
Juliane Okot Bitek « poet | writer | scholar
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
abidhussainabid.com
Abid Hussain Abid – Poet & Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
julielmoore.com
Julie L. Moore — Poet & Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
annecaldwell.net
Anne Caldwell - Prose Poet & Editor | Anne Caldwell
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
judithlefay.com
Judy B Wagnon – Writer and Storyteller
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
theashogren.com
Thea Shogren – Writer / Educator / Storyteller
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
alanmoore.net
Alan Moore - Poet & Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
absenceclub.com
Absence Club – The website of writer and poet Daniel Bennett
2 shared topicspoetry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.