Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to audencrane.com

Auden Crane | Author & Poetess · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
authoran.com
Alicia Nicole | Author & Poet
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
authorsamiya.com
Samiya Akram | Author & Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
73match
alexlangston.com
A. M. Langston – Author and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
71match
tessachenoa.com
tessachenoa.com – author site
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
pamvercoe.com
Pam Vercoe – Artist Poet Author
2 shared topicspoetry
70match
atrainach.com
A.T. Rainach, Author – Author
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
pamelaueckerman.com
Pamela Ueckerman – Children's Author & Poet
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
rebekahrholley.com
Rebekah R Holley – Author Webpage
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
authorfoxjones.com
Author Fox Jones
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
byungafallgren.com
Byung A. Fallgren | Story & poetry
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
paigewalkerauthor.com
Paige Walker – -Author
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
alanjwrightauthorpoet.com
Alan j Wright Author Poet
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
authorcharliebown.com
Charlie Bown – Children's Author
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
ashleyclaytonkay.com
Ashley Clayton Kay – Author | Poet | Freelance Writer | Editor
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
austinsegrest.com
Author of Door to Remain | Austin Segrest Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
julesjacob.com
Home - Jules Jacob - Poet . Author
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
elathaweems.com
Elatha Weems | Author | Songwriter
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
jsgpoet.com
Jessie Scrimager Galloway: Poet - Author Site
2 shared topicspoetry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.