Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to auctioningmytime.com

Auctioning My Time · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
byjuliabyers.com
by Julia Byers – writing my story, one page at a time
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
actionbooks.org
Action Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
courtneymarquez.com
Word by Word | Creating myself one word at a time.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
burningbooks.com
Burning Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
bruwicked.com
Bruwicked Productions
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
silentactions.com
Silent Actions
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
1stmist.com
MOUNTAIN MIST PRODUCTIONS
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
5timesaslave.com
5 Times A Slave
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
reginamallen.com
Regina M. Allen – Exploring My Voice
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
brwtime.com
Borrowed Time
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
acourtofcoffeeandbooks.com
Saving the world… One book at a time
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
aneveningwithcslewis.com
An Evening with C.S. Lewis | Bird and Baby Productions
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
addingsunshine.org
Adding Sunshine – One Ray at a Time
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
juliesalamon.com
Julie Salamon – New York Times Bestselling Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
abstractionistpapers.com
The Abstractionist’s Papers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
thebookofhow.com
The Abstractionist’s Papers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
adaconnection.com
Ada Connection
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
buggouts.com
The BuggOuts Learning Club
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.