Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to atvcapital.com

ATV - Advanced Technology Ventures · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
redwoodtechnologyventures.com
Redwood Technology Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
76match
btv-iot.com
Bright Technology Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
75match
academictechventures.com
Academic Technology Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
73match
accesstechnologyventures.com
Technology Ventures - Access Industries
1 shared topicsventure-capital
72match
atlasven.com
Industrial Technology Vc | Atlas Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
70match
oxfordtechnologyvct.com
Oxford Technology
1 shared topicsventure-capital
70match
astoragroup.com
Astora - Digital Investment Group | Media Technology Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
69match
sinarmastechnology.com
Sinarmas Technology - Corporate Venture Capital Firm
1 shared topicsventure-capital
69match
actenergy.org
ACT Energy Ventures, LLC
1 shared topicsventure-capital
69match
relevanceventures.com
Relevance Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
adbventures.org
Home - ADB Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
ads-ventures.com
Home - ADS Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
andryventures.com
Andry Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
active-tech-ventures.com
Active Tech Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
loreyventures.com
Lorey Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
relayventures.com
Relay Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
hitechventures.net
Hitech Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
homoapps.com
AZTech Ventures
1 shared topicsventure-capital

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.