Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to atticuskim.dev

Atticus Kim · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
raphaelattias.com
Raphaël Attias
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
jiahkim.com
Jiah Kim
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
gyuholee.com
Gyuho Lee — Data Platform Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
jessieyuqing.com
Qing Yu — Full-stack & AI Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
aerinkim.org
Aerin Kim
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
techopulse.com
techopulse - Where Intelligence Innovates Technology
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
ashishsinghal.dev
Ashish Singhal — AI & Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
abhijithh.dev
ABHIJITH
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
jimkleban.com
Jim Kleban
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
raphaelattar.com
Raphael Attar
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
techwithcolonel.com
Sushant Satyam — Engineer, AI Tinkerer, Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
caleblaing.tech
Caleb Laing – Software Engineer & Developer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
jacquesdupoux.com
Jacques Dupoux
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
leoniemonigatti.com
Hi, I’m Leonie – Leonie Monigatti
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
digitvibe.com
DigitVibe
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dkatsiros.com
Dimitris Katsiros — Data Engineer & ML Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
jaisonbinns.com
Jaison
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
rahulawale.com
Rahul Awale | Applied AI / ML Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.