Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to astrofield.org

Astrofield · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
annshenfield.com
Ann Shenfield
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
mattylogs.com
MattyLogs
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
rosecanfield.com
Home - RoseCanfield.com
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
roastreads.com
RoastReads
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
sofiemeyer.com
Sofie Meyer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
faroukghataty.com
Farouk Ghataty
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
intheexpandedfield.com
Ethnography in the Expanded Field
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
themellowfield.com
The Owl's Nest - Mellowfield
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
pirirara.com
装丁カフェ
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
pitchatarn.com
Pitchatarn Blog
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
aletamwordsartastrologyandmore.com
Aleta M Words Art Astrology and More
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
thelogosfield.com
The Logos Field — A Living Field of Logos
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
growmindfulness.com
Grow Mindfulness – By Dr. Ron Passfield
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
pitzigilpublications.com
PitziGil Publications
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
solpaul.com
From the Killing Fields to the Corn Fields Book
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
akshatashanbhag.com
Home - Akshata Shanbhag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
andymerrifield.org
andy merrifield | Writer, urbanist, marxist, educator
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
intpubnyc.com
International Publishers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.