Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to astridrappel.com

Astrid Rappel – Astrid Rappel · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
lucasrussiarch.com
Lucas Russi – Architektur Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
nidus-studio.de 🇩🇪
Nidus – Building Culture
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
lorenzkaiser.com
Lorenz Kaiser – Architekt in Hamm
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
atelierfuenfdrei.com
Projekte – atelierfünfdrei
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
horizon-surge.com
Horizon Surge – Architekturgeschichte trifft urbane Innovation
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
rear-award.com
REAR Award – Reflect Architecture Award 2026
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
lorenzodechiffre.com
Lorenzo De Chiffre – Architektur / Architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
buro-l.com
Buró L – Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
juliameisel.com
Julia Meisel – Eine andere WordPress-Site.
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
atelier-framont.com
atelier framont – architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
62match
aleev.net
Aleksandr Aleev – Aleksandr Aleev
1 shared topicsdesign
62match
funky-foil.com
Funky-Foil Essen – Ihr Partner für Design & Beschriftung
1 shared topicsdesign
62match
mrpander.com
Felix Sander – Creative Director aus Berlin
1 shared topicsdesign
62match
neuweiss.de 🇩🇪
neuweiss – studio für visuelle kommunikation, berlin
1 shared topicsdesign
62match
penthouse-location.de 🇩🇪
Spreefreunde Group – Event, Brand & Design Agentur Berlin
1 shared topicsdesign
62match
creative-lobby.com
CREATIVE LOBBY – Beratungsunternehmen für Menschen mit Ideen
1 shared topicsdesign
62match
alexandertochtermann.com
Alexander Tochtermann
1 shared topicsdesign
62match
ebnoether.com
Yves Ebnöther – Büro Industriedesign
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.