Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aspear.net

Anders Spear · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
angio.net
Dave Andersen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
mattfender.com
Matthew Fender
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
afspear2000.com
Andrew Spear
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
adhirajpandey.tech
Adhiraj Pandey
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
billsaunders.dev
Bill Saunders
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
robinwassen.com
Robin Andersson's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexanderlindholm.net
Alexander Lindholm
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ashish.me
Ashish Patel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ashleylavery.com
Ashley Lavery - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
adityamohta.dev
Kumar Aditya Mohta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
adrianmiles.io
Adrian Miles - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
divisionfieldguide.com
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kylecaprio.dev
Kyle Caprio | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kylezapcic.com
Kyle Zapcic
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kyrilibragimov.com
Kyril Ibragimov
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.