similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to askus.at

Askus alternatives & similar sites

ask:us – Wir gestalten mit - Ein Service von AIT — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sapphire-crossing.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sapphire Crossing – Technik verstehen, Innovation erleben, Zukunft gestalten	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luminous-rails.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Luminous Rails – Smarter Durchblick für Hamburgs Tech-Szene	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jimmyservers.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	JimmyBones.de – Home	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luxe-pulse.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Luxe Pulse – Innovative Technologie-Trends hautnah erleben und verstehen	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zweitvolt.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Zweitvolt – Battery Engineering, BMS & Testsysteme	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
inucos.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Chaos Computer Club – Wikipedia	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
it-aktuell.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Informatik Aktuell – Magazin für Informationstechnik	DE de	technology-and-computing TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lumen-spark.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Lumen Spark – Technik verständlich erklärt	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netzwerkwissen.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Netzwerkwissen - Ihr Wissensportal für Technologie, Netzwerke und digitale Innovation	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inclusion-tech-lab.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Teilhabe durch Technologie - Inclusion Tech Lab	DE de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developher.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	developHER \| Tech-Events von OTTO	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joomlazur.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Joomlazur - Dein digitales Magazin für Technik, Innovation und digitale Trends	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usabilityfail.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	usabilityfail.orgusabilityfail.org	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usabilityfails.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	usabilityfail.orgusabilityfail.org	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developbyter.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Developbyter Blog – Technik-News, Tutorials und Projekte	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
headnews.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Eine dynamische Quelle vielfältiger Inhalte	DE de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-howl.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Howl - Ihre digitale Perspektive auf Innovation und Technologie in Bremerhaven	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hellotrust.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	hellotrust - Cookie Consent Management	DE de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.