Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ashishthampi.com

Ashish Thampi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
benjaminmuntz.com
Benjamin Muntz – Theoretical Physicist and Science Communicator
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
rjamould.com
Robbie Mould
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
mathwalker.com
Matthew R. Walker
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
maximilian-alberth.com
Maximilian Alberth | Experimental Physicist
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
asdn.net
Atomic Scale Design Network (ASDN)
2 shared topicsscience
63match
arjunveejay.com
About Dr. Arjun Vijaywargiya
2 shared topicsscience
63match
clowderproject.com
Index — The Clowder Project
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
bhojrajbhandari.com
Bhojraj Bhandari | Neuromorphic Photonics Researcher
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
robertoliva.com
Robert Oliva – CV & Software
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
solvforyou.com
The Science Babe - Dr. Debbie Berebichez, Ph.D. in Physics
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
rofick.com
The Rofick Blog - Projects, Research & Interests
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
adrian-huber.org
Home | Adrian Huber
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
djbinder.com
Latest Posts – Damon Binder
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
algebra-lincoln.org
Charlotte Scott Centre for Algebra | School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Lincoln
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
bolaeniwaye.com
Bolaji Eniwaye
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
matthewabruzzo.com
Matthew W. Abruzzo
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
matteoacrossi.com
Matteo A. C. Rossi
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
nexothink.com
Nexothink: Your Random Knowledge Hotspot | Nexothink
2 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.