Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ashercantrell.com

Asher Cantrell · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
asherchronicles.com
The Asher Chronicles
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
bobasherbooks.com
Bob Asher
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
ashercross.net
Asher Cross -Asher Cross — Author
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
clovercox.com
Clover Cox
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
benisonchristopher.com
The Benison Christopher Company
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
gregoryashe.com
Gregory Ashe
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
bobpuglisi.com
Bob Puglisi Author/Publisher 2019
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
gretafisher.com
- Greta Fisher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
thekillerofvenice.com
The Killer of Venice by Bill Luttrell III
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
bluenortherpress.com
Blue Norther Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
inspectorcanal.com
The World of Inspector Canal - Inspector Canal
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
thepetrelgazette.com
The Petrel Gazette
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
thesiegerchronicles.com
The Sieger Chronicles
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
angryeyebrowpress.com
Angry Eyebrow Press – Publisher of Fantasy and Romance
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
themuskokanovels.com
The Muskoka & Other Novels
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
adaptivepressllc.com
Independent Publisher of Adult Fiction & Non-Fiction | VerbaFrog
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
fathereadred.com
The Last Days - Father Eadred
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
61match
maureenfischer.com
MaureenFischer – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.