Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to asger.org

Asger Kirkemann Strandby · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
dobermannstudios.com
Dobermann Studios
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
mattiabeffa.com
Portfolio - Mattia Beffa
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
benstewartgames.com
Ben Stewart – Game Designer and Scripter
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
solglaive.com
Brandon Smith – Game Designer and Gameplay Programmer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
iprajwal.com
Prajwal Pandey – Technical Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
benstoddard.com
Ben Stoddard - Level Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
mateuszfigura.com
Mateusz Figura | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
roguestradale.com
Rogue Stradale
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
arielleshander.com
Arielle Shander – Game Designer and IT Professional
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
interactivemadness.com
Morgan Wilson - Morgan Wilson
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
aleksandrivashchenko.com
Aleksandr Ivashchenko
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
grusso94.com
Giacomo Russo | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
maxlom.com
maxlom
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
artifexdemon.com
♱ ARTIFEX ♱
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
krishnajawale.com
Krishna Jawale: Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
kungfusquirrel.com
Andrew Weldon: Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
robnelissen.com
Home | Rob Nelissen
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
arkahedron.com
Arkahedron
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.