Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aseef.dev

Aseef's Blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
bmutinda.com
Boniface Mutinda - Boniface Mutinda
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
75match
nextgreatmemoir.com
Next Great Memoir
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
75match
noconfidencesuperpac.com
The Future Now
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
doms-diary.com
Dom's Diary
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
fasihbookshop.com
Fasih's Book Shop
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
rohitgattani.com
Rohit’s Blog
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
dofams.com
Bilingual Children's Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
thesaifhouse.com
The Bitcoiner's Bookshop
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
donaldbrianbooks.com
Delightful Children's Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
4everfloating.com
asma's blog
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
dostoevskyspiano.com
Dostoevsky's Piano
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
matrixmediaht.com
User's blog
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
pilgrimmediastudio.com
User's blog
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
bhuvansworld.com
Bhuvan's World website
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
bluebeagleideas.com
Blue Beagle Ideas – Thoughts and Ideas – Lachlan Smith
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
therksahu.com
The RK Sahu – Stories, Thoughts, and Perspectives
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
fazparadox.com
Faz's Paradox | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
activityvolt.com
Activity Volt | Children's Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.