Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aschbr.dev

aschbr · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
nflverse.com
nflverse · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
dita-users.com
DITA Users · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
thepotato.dev
ThePotatoGuy · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
benedikt-lohse.dev
LinuxTux23 (bl) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
mattchard.com
mchar7 (Matt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
invition.dev
iNViTiON (MiX) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mb-media.net
vonWeihermuehle · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
robertsenseman.com
rsenseman (Rob) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
therealdev.com
Josh-XT (Josh XT) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
themoosman.com
themoosman (Karl Moos) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
dodmantech.com
devinschumacher’s gists · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
albatross-kb.com
Library of Possibility · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
asm.im
Soulghost (Sou1gh0st) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
arjen.dev
arjenbos (Arjen Bos) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
mattjberry.com
mberry-hub (Matt Berry) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
kybouw.com
kybouw (Kyle Bouwman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
kylebouwman.com
kybouw (Kyle Bouwman) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.