Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to asaffarber.com

Asaf Farber | Video Game Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
griyarts.com
GT Arts | Video Game Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
griyteam.com
GT Arts | Video Game Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
solideo.com
Home - Solideo - Video Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
bhvr.com
Behaviour Interactive, Video Game Developer | Home Page
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
adstudios.cloud
Video Game Developers | Build Your Game Today!
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
adstudios.one
Video Game Developers | Build Your Game Today!
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
afterdarkstudios.cloud
Video Game Developers | Build Your Game Today!
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
bloodhunt.com
Sharkmob | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
kuzeyonder.com
Young Game Developer | Vibe Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
robbiema.dev
Robbie Ma | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
maximtsai.com
Maxim Tsai - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
4funcity.com
FUN - Upcoming Video Game Development - Berlin
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
matanmaron.com
Matan Maron | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
adv.ec
ADVEC – Ecuadorian Video Game Developers Association
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
mattvale.dev
Matthew Vale | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
ronkad.com
Ronkad - Indie Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
farbiesqahshair.com
Indie Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
krishnajawale.com
Krishna Jawale: Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.