Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to arvinziaei.dev

Arvin Ziaei · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
cmaasys.com
CMAAS
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bengarvin.dev
Home | Ben Garvin
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mattgarvin.com
The Matt Garvin Project ver 1V.07
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
rj-irvine.com
RJ Irvine
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gsmunbrick.com
GSMUnbrick
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mattlehrer.com
Matt Lehrer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
nevingilday.com
Nevin Gilday
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
pkvillanueva.com
Patrick Villanueva
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
abdelrahmanelsayed.tech
Abdelrahman Elsayed
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
abdelrahman.cloud
Abdelrahman ElSayed
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
socialinfluencagency.com
Jarvis Command Center
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
benzaporzan.me
Home | Benjamin Zaporzan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
cloonk.com
Kevin Zhang — UX Researcher & Data Analyst | cloonk.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
bhaak.net
Patric Müller's homepage
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
kupatrix.com
Kupatrix - Ramblings of a Geek
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
andyfitz.me
Andrew Fitzpatrick's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
abdelrahmanali.dev
Abdelrahman Ali — Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
boodtama.com
Kevin Boodtama, product design leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.