Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to artyomportfolio.com

Artyom Petrosyan Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
greggant.com
Greg Gant Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
dogukanergin.com
Emre Doğukan ERGIN | Portfolio
2 shared topicscomputing
68match
ioxor.com
IOXOR – Brian Knoll's Rarely Updated Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alectronix.net
Alex H | Cosmic Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
about-efrink.dev
Ethan Frink — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexandreck.dev
Alexandre C.K. - Portfolio
2 shared topicscomputing
66match
newtonkaburu.com
Newton Kaburu Portfolio - Computer Engineering Student
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abdulaziz-abdukhafizov.com
Abdulaziz Abdukhafizov — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
0xsiddhant.com
siddhant@portfolio:~ — zsh
2 shared topicscomputing
65match
aaronkleiman.dev
Aaron Kleiman - Computer Engineer | Portfolio
2 shared topicscomputing
65match
roemerblom.com
Roemer Blom
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
a7hub.org
A7Hub Portal
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
codelockssupport.com
Codelocks Support Portal | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
codemacabre.com
Code Macabre
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
ale-leehrtz.org
C. Alejandra Carreon
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
masonum.com
Mason Um — TPM @ NVIDIA
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
akshayud.me
Akshay Bhosale
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
rohanpankaj.com
Rohan Pankaj
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.