Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to arturkim.com

Artur Kim · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
aj-project.co.uk 🇬🇧
Artur Jasinski | Resume
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
sonyakim.com
Sonya Kim
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
boazfrazierbey.com
Boaz Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
fengliurenwu.com
花满楼的小窝
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
bgk.dev
about - kimbogyeong.com
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
codewithluisart.com
Luis Arturo Hernandez | Senior Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
ashleyoconnor.dev
Ashley O'Connor's Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
newdevos.com
New Dev OS - Powered by DMT
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
boazsottie.com
Boaz Sottie - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
cmeijerink.com
Corjan Meijerink MSc | MyRoute-app
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
nickgazzola.com
Nick Gazzola - Startup Consultant
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
fatkulnurk.com
Fatkul Nur Koirudin | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
gunturwicaksono.com
Guntur Wicaksono — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
nextvibetech.com
NextVibe - Your Key to Digital Success
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
matanmaimon.com
Matan Boaz Maimon – Developer Websites
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
benhartung.dev
Ben Hartung – Work, traval and other things.
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
bentsku.dev
Ben Hartung – Work, traval and other things.
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
1xcoder.dev
buzzjective - Developer Help for SMEs & Startups
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.