similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to artsycorks.com

Artsy Corks – Artsy Corks · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

ronbatesauthor.com

Ron Bates – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

artesianword.com

Donna Rhodes – Artesian Word Publishing

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ron Rindo – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

5 Star Books – Mini Course

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Bobbi Rise – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Fay Keenan – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

inspirereadsofficial.com

InspireReads – A BookStore

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arjundristi.com

Arjun dristi – Arjun Dristi

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

DJ Smailes – Writing

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bobshepherdauthor.com

Bob Shepherd – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ipaziabooks.com

Ipazia Books – Book Publisher

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Max G Foster – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

roanox – t-4-2

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

thepowerofhisbread.com

FADI ARNAOUT – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ariannewrites.com

Arianne James – Writer

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

gregwoodlandauthor.com

Greg Woodland – Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ipenitbooks.com

Only Books – Book Store Online

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.