Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to artmnk.com

Artem Gumeniuk · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
60match
caie.dev
Welliton Scheer
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
alexshepherd.dev
Alex Shepherd
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
60match
abhishek-portfolio.tech
AC | Programming projects portfolio
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
60match
athousandnodes.com
A thousand nodes
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
60match
egunde.com
About
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
60match
lorraine.dev
Lorraine Quezada · Portfolio
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
60match
mtsayed.com
Mohammad Sayed – Code, life, and everything in between
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
muniba.dev
Muniba | AI & Web Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
rebecca-mayers.com
Rebecca Mayers - Python Programmer. Data Scientist. Neuroscientist.
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
42match
builditbabygpt.app
SiteGenius AI
2 shared topicsweb-development
42match
abimael.me
Abimael Martell – Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
42match
redlem.com
GETTING STARTED WITH BRACKETS
2 shared topicsweb-development
42match
testelka.com
testelka.com - Test automation with Selenium
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
42match
buildmorethings.com
TanStack Start Starter
2 shared topicsweb-development
42match
fusionjs.com
Fusion.js Documentation
2 shared topicsweb-development
42match
anmolagrawal.me
Anmol Agrawal | AI & Blockchain Developer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
42match
rebeccabarter.com
Welcome – Rebecca Barter
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
41match
buildaicode.com
Smarter Insights Code Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.