Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to artj.dev

Artur Jaklewicz: Graduate Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
evanbuss.com
Evan Buss - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
abey.dev
Abey Thomas - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
charlieold.com
Charlie Old | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
arnisritins.dev
Arnis Ritins | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
kippmr.com
Matthew Kipp | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
abhinavcodes.tech
Abhinav Anand | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
estebanborai.com
Esteban Borai | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
andrewflanery.dev
Andrew Flanery - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ayoublamini.dev
Ayoub Lamini — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
pavletosic.com
Pavle Tošić — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
charrafi.com
Mohamed Charrafi | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
devsowrov.com
Minhazur Rahaman - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
tewodrosmekonnen.com
Tewodros Mekonnen | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
0xpuddu.com
Alessandro Porcheddu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
abimael.me
Abimael Martell – Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
8qbit.me
8qBIT | qLabs Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.