Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to arthurcose.dev

ArthurCose · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
arthurpham.com
Arthur Pham
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
arthuralves.com
Arthur Alves
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
arthurgousset.com
Arthur Gousset
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
rockyourcode.com
rockyourcode
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
addithurston.com
Addison Thurston — Computer Science, SLU
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
acepace.net
My website | Musing on random technical subjects
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
aclevername.dev
Jake Klein (aclevername)
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
aclit.org
ACL-IT Website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
achow101.com
Ava Chow
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
acmwuc.org
ACM-W at UC
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
acrispycookie.dev
ACrispyCookie | Minecraft plugin developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
adalace.org
Adalace | Adalace
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
akselkristoffersen.dev
Aksel Kristoffersen | Oslo, Norway
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
aks.io
Akshay Srivatsan
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
alanschwartzjr.com
Alan Schwartz Jr. | Resume
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
alander.org
Even Galland Alander
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
alandjackson.com
Alan Jackson's Blog – Painless Coding
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
alastairs-place.net
Alastair’s Place
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.