Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to arnelle.dev

Arnelle Balane · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
arnellebalane.com
Arnelle Balane
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
dominicva.com
Dom van Almsick - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
alexmaldonado.dev
Alex Maldonado - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
max-heller.com
Max Heller | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
nextechtradellc.com
Maulana Ahmad Aji Triadi
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
mcraepetrey.com
McRae Petrey | Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
annabellestrong.com
Annabelle Strong
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
matthieugrieger.com
Matthieu Grieger
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
abuzer.tech
Abuzer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
mat3o.com
Matthew Nowicki
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
matroussilhe.com
Mathieu Roussilhe
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
roddehugo.com
Hugo Rodde
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
thepaulstella.com
Paul A. Stella II
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
bigzoo.me
Chris Nyaga
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
billgranfield.com
Bill Granfield - Software Engineering
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
albaraamansour.dev
Al-Baraa Mansour
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
maxhogan.dev
Max Hogan
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.