Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to armani.tech

Jonathan's poor excuse for a website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
narthur.com
Nathan's corner of the internet
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
nairda.dev
Adrian's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
nairdawg.com
Adrian's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
nairdev.com
Adrian's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
akaritakai.net
Olivia's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
majidhazari.com
Majid Hazari – Personal website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
gogetitmagazine.com
GO GET IT Magazine Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
reubenroshan.com
Reuben's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
6uild.com
The Guild of Blockchain Artisans | 6uild-website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ethos92.com
EthOS' Very Swag Website Yo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
manasverma.dev
Manas Verma | Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
remidurand.com
Rémi DURAND - Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bestwebsitelist.com
Best Websites List
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alankay.net
Alan Kay's Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bgillespie.com
Home - Bryan Gillespie's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kirkkohler.com
About Me | Kirk Kohler’s Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
simonwoodtli.com
Simon's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
0k-loh.dev
Kelvin's Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.