Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to arkha.app

ARKHA - NASA Space Apps · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
guerrero-space-apps.org
NASA Space Apps Challenge
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
68match
romantelescope.com
Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope - NASA Science
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
67match
thesecom.com
SECOM Space Archive
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
67match
newjointproject.com
European Space Agency
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
newspacelabsllc.com
New Space Laboratories
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
esaspacesolutions.ie 🇮🇪
ESA Space Solutions Centre Ireland
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
integratedspaceanalytics.com
Integrated Space Analytics
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
integratedspaceanalytics.net
Integrated Space Analytics
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
integratedspaceanalytics.org
Integrated Space Analytics
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
krutrimspacetech.com
Krutrim Space Tech
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
bluemoonspaceops.com
Blue Moon Space Ops
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
labispace.com
Labi Space
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
agirlaguyaspacehelmet.com
A Girl, A Guy, A Space Helmet
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
materia-sv.com
Materia - Space Visualization
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
pillarspace.com
Pillar Space Systems
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
robin-space.com
Robin Space
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
romulusspace.com
Romulus Space Technology
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
soleilspace.com
Soleil Space
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.