Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to arhandky.dev

Arhan Dönerkaya • Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
natejms.com
natejms - software developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
etsub.com
Etsub - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
amitray.dev
Amit Ray — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
nateamack.com
Nate Amack, Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
impey.io
Chris Impey - London software developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
amirsolo.com
Amir Solo – Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andrewnt.dev
Andrew Nguyen - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ashleyhylton.com
Ashley Hylton | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
pedrozurita.com
Pedro Zurita | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
nafania.com
Anya Saunders | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
annawallstrom.com
Anna Wallström - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
akshaybenny.com
Akshay Benny | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
khwandao.com
Khwandao Aitsara — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
devinreeks.com
Software Development Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
simoncodes.com
Simon | Software Developer | Full-stack
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
amitxtech.com
Amit Chaudhary - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
sinanaseri.com
Sina Naseri — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
andrewhickey.tech
Andrew Hickey - Freelance Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.