Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to argymeg.net

argymeg (Argy Megalios) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
simonczech.com
sczech (Simon Czech) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
jrodrigop.com
jeanrodrigop (Jean Rodrigo) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
owdevel.com
owdevel (Owen Mak) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
acelaya.com
acelaya (Alejandro Celaya) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
aterra.dev
AterraEngine · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kaminooni.dev
kaminooni (Artem) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
redite.dev
Redite · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
adag.io
rpetrich (Ryan Petrich) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
1nikolas.dev
1nikolas (Nikolas Spiridakis) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kaogeek.dev
Kao.Geek · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
byjarno.com
byjarno (Jarno) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kevinejohn.com
kevinejohn (KJ) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kharding.com
klutchell (Kyle Harding) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
acmesoft.dev
sean-rabbitt (Sean Rabbitt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
jvandort.com
jvandort (Justin Van Dort) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
albrecht.dev
simonalbrecht (Simon Albrecht) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
abraham.dev
abraham (Abraham Williams) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.