Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to argument.de

Home - Argument Verlag mit Ariadne · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
schubert-und-kahl.de 🇩🇪
Kahl Verlag: Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
nelao-books.com
Nelao Verlag
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
pendragon.de 🇩🇪
Home | Pendragon Verlag, Bielefeld
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
prolibris-verlag.de 🇩🇪
Startseite - Prolibris Verlag Rolf Wagner
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
seriennotizen.de 🇩🇪
Home - Seriennotizen
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
palabros.de 🇩🇪
Kölner Independent Verlag und Geschichtenerzähler Palabros de Cologne ®
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
sandra-andrea-huber.de 🇩🇪
Home - Sandra Andrea Huber - Autorin & Illustratorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
ritterrost.com
Die Welt von Ritter Rost - Ueberreuter Verlag
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
pmachinery.de 🇩🇪
p.machinery – – Verlag für Primär- & Sekundärliteratur
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
peter-kayne.com
Peter Kayne - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
anjafielenbach.net
Startseite - Anja Fielenbach
2 shared topicsfiction
62match
kreismal.com
Home | Büchermonde
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
peter-orontes.com
HOME – Peter Orontes - Historische Romane
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
neuroquo.com
Marcus Jensen - Aktuelles
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
robertpreis.com
Robert Preis - Autor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
maschinengespraeche.com
Gespräche mit Maschinen
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
siegfried-verlag.de 🇩🇪
Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
62match
arianekind.com
Ariane Kind
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.