Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ardada.com

아르다다 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
68match
hanamplaza.com
M플라자 for HANA
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
66match
hi-mimi.com
안녕미미
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
64match
mamisonpartners.com
마미손고무장갑
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
63match
hanapapermall.com
하나페이퍼몰 - 지류 및 패키지 전문 업체
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
62match
medifreshmall.com
메디포스트코리아
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
60match
greanew.com
그래뉴
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryhousehold-supplies
60match
ggonggu.com
아는사람 l 공동구매
5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
59match
baeung.com
쇼핑몰 이름
5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
59match
bonghwalocalfood.com
봉화군로컬푸드
5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
59match
boseungmall.com
보승몰
5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
59match
ceeannbed.com
시이안 베드
5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
greenhublab.com
그린허브
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
bookvaja.com
기본 레이아웃
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
havatishop.com
Havati (하바티)
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
hjkorea.com
한주코리아
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
58match
medinshop.com
의료기기쇼핑몰 메디앤샵
5 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
56match
4d-creator.com
4DGUZ
6 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
56match
janeuk.com
자늑 인센스 공식 B2B 쇼핑몰
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorygifts-and-greetings-cards

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.