Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ar-fandy.dev

Arfandy — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
adilraqioui.tech
Adil Raqioui — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
bhaktipokhrel.com
Bhakti Pokhrel — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
aronesusau.com
Arone Susau — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
rodin.dev
Ilia Rodin — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
matiasrotondo.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
3lt.dev
3LT — Software Engineering Studio
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andrewbrysonbolles.com
Drew Bolles — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andrewbolles.com
Drew Bolles — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
bhaumicsingh.dev
Bhaumic Singh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
felicecaricati.com
Felice Caricati — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andydelgado.dev
Andy Delgado | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
iqbal-atma.com
Iqbal Atma — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
theryanmoreno.com
Ryan Moreno — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
faridraka.dev
Farid Raka | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
felipenava.dev
Felipe Nava — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
pimmey.com
Yegor Borisenco – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ahsaanullah.dev
Ahsaan Ullah — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.