Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to aprilmackwrites.com

April Mack - YA fantasy author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
demiwinters.com
Demi Winters, Romantasy Author
3 shared topicsfiction
69match
andrearinaldiperez.com
Andrea Rinaldi-Perez – Fantasy and romance author
3 shared topicsfiction
69match
charleneantrobus.com
Charlene Antrobus - Romantasy Author
3 shared topicsfiction
68match
demetriapaxton.com
Home | Demetria Paxton - Romantasy Author
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
amyruttan.com
Home - Author Amy Ruttan
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
cheriedesues2.com
Main Author Page
3 shared topicsfiction
65match
gleewrites.com
Indie Author | Gleewrites
3 shared topicsfiction
65match
the-rogue-king.com
Author Abigail Owen – #1 NY Times Bestselling Romantasy & PNR Author
3 shared topicsfiction
65match
kimboykin.com
Kim Boykin Books | Author in Sedona
3 shared topicsfiction
65match
amyprokopis.com
Amy Prokopis | Author
3 shared topicsfiction
64match
abmoss.net
A. B. Moss – Author
3 shared topicsfiction
64match
anderfeldt.com
Welcome to the Website of M.P. Anderfeldt, Author
3 shared topicsfiction
64match
chelseymortega.com
Chelsey M. Ortega | Author of magic and romance
3 shared topicsfiction
64match
patriciakay.com
Patricia Kay, USA Today Bestselling Author
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
kimberlinbelle.com
Sally Bayless – Cozy Mystery Author
3 shared topicsfiction
64match
kjduncanauthor.com
Home - K.J. Duncan - Author
3 shared topicsfiction
64match
gmontagneri.com
Giovanna Montagneri - Author
3 shared topicsfiction
63match
angeladeles.com
Author | Angela Delés
3 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.