Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to appsmedical.com

Software de Historias Clínicas para Ecuador - AppsMedical · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
47match
blipdoc.com
BlipDoc | Gestión de Turnos OnLine
3 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
44match
miconsultorionline.com
Software historias clínicas
4 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymedical-health
43match
123medico.com
Médico a domicilio Cali - Médico a domicilio Cali - Medico domiciliario Cali
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorymedical-health
42match
bienconsalud.com
Bien con Salud – La web que cuida tu salud y la de tu familia
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymedical-health
41match
doctopro.com
DOCTOPRO | Tu plataforma de gestión de salud
3 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
41match
abcsivmed.com
ABC Sivmed mantenimiento preventivo mantenimiento correctivo
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
41match
doctorideal.com
Encuentra el mejor centro médico para ti
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorymedical-health
39match
mafemedical.com
Distribuidores de equipo médico en México - Mafe Medical Service
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health
38match
cuidamisalud.com
Cuida Mi Salud | Atención médica rápida y accesible para ti
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorydental-health
38match
migrantesespana.com
MediMigrate España
3 co-citations2 shared categorymedical-health
38match
caaring.com
Caaring®
3 co-citations2 shared categorymedical-health
37match
januxmd.com
JANUX MD – Expediente Clínico Electrónico
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorymedical-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.