similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to apply.ch

Apply alternatives & similar sites

apply.ch | Digital Content für Web und Social Media erstellen — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Content Production →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
juliahoerter.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Julia Hörter – Social Media & Content – Virtuelle Assistenz	Germany de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jolance.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Johanna Speer \| social media management	Germany de	content-production Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
snapinnovation.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Workflowmanagement für deinen Content \| SNAP Innovation	de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jannegreta.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Janne Greta – Authentischer Content für mehr Reichweite	Germany de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
4basedapp.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	4based - die Lösung für Content Creators	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccpetersen.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Digitale Produkte & Content – From the Clouds to the Crowds	de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
contentwork.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Contentwork. - Voice. Motion. Social.	Switzerland de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3h-handels-gbr.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	3H Content	Germany de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gasser-digital.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	gasser digital - Startseite	Switzerland de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4basedcreators.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	4based \| Finanzielle Freiheit gewinnen Wie 4based Content Creator stärkt und unterstützt	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janinewittig.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Mentorin für strategische Contentplanung & bewegendes Content-Design	Germany de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jensfox.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Moin - Jens Fox \| Coaching Content Creation	Germany de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
interactive-link.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Interactive GEM \| Content im richtigen Umfeld	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
interactivegem.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Interactive GEM \| Content im richtigen Umfeld	de	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
expert-content.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Storytelling & Content-Strategie \| Expert Content	de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wandergitarre.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Wir erzählen Geschichten: Storytelling für und von Menschen	de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dersergio.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Der Sergio, der Digital Creator, der Walliser \| Der Sergio Walliser watson Digital Creator Ballo bündig	Switzerland de	content-production Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4ten-records.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - The HEG.digital	de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.